![]() ![]() However, it has been confirmed that the blood and image have separate origins. The blood is separate from the image on the Shroud. Skeptics have long thought that the image and blood on theīlood on the Shroud. Thus, the 1988 testing is no longer the knockout punch that it was once held to be. to 400 A.D., well within the time of Jesus of Nazareth (Stanglin, USA Today, 2013). In 2013, a new set of tests were conducted on the Shroud that placed the cloth to the time ranging from 300 B.C. Recent studies confirmed that this was the case as dye was found on the fibers that were tested, indicating that the fibers did not originate with the original cloth (Adams, Telegraph, 2009). It is now widely accepted that the fibers tested in 1988 came from the nuns' repair work. A person can still see the marks on the Shroud where it was damaged. It is well documented that the Shroud was damaged by a fire in the 1200s and was extinguished and repaired by a group of nuns at the cathedral where the Shroud was held. Positive image on the left, negative on the rightĬonsensus of researchers are accepting the notion that the 1988 carbon-dating test was flawed (Stephen Adams, Telegraph, 2009). The 1988 carbon-dating test was flawed. Many researchers will dispute the claim, however, a growing.From my research, I have discovered 8 reasons why the Shroud is probably the authentic burial cloth of Jesus. Yet, data will lead one to accept or reject the Shroud’s authenticity. There is no way to conclusively prove or disprove the Shroud. However, if the Shroud is authentic, it adds further weight to the Christian’s claim. As one investigates the Shroud, it must be understood that the resurrection of Jesus does not rest upon the Shroud’s authenticity. Further tests seem to elevate the probability of the Shroud’s authenticity. thus seemingly proving that the Shroud was a medieval hoax. The test deemed that the Shroud dated to around 1260-1390 A.D. The Shroud is quite controversial, especially since 1988. A team of researchers took three samples from the Shroud and dated them using radiocarbon at three independent laboratories. Full length of the Shroud, positive image. Blood covers the Shroud especially at the nail marks on the hands and feet. The hands of the man are crossed while the knees are slightly bent. The front and the back of the crucified man is shown, the front on one end of the cloth and the back on the other end with the head meeting towards the middle. The Shroud of Turin is a 14’ 5” x 3’ 7” linen cloth that holds the image of a crucified man that matches the description of the manner in which Jesus of Nazareth was crucified. Either it is one of the most incredible, holy relics related to Jesus of Nazareth or it is one of the most ingenious hoaxes ever invented. The Shroud of Turin is perhaps one of the most controversial artifacts of all-time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |